Saturday, September 29, 2007
Mark Hill in WSJ
Update on Joe Arpaio, Sheriff, Maricopa Co. Sheriff, Author Unknown
He has jail meals down to 40 cents a serving and charges the inmates for them.
He stopped smoking and porno magazines in the jails.
Took away their weights.
Cut off all but "G" movies.
He started chain gangs so the inmates could do free work on county and city projects.
Then he started chain gangs for women so he wouldn't get sued for discrimination.
He took away cable TV until he found out there was a federal cour torder that required cable TV for jails. So he hooked up the cable TV again, only let in the Disney channel and the weather channel. When asked why the weather channel he replied, "So they will know how hot it's gonna be while they are working on my chain gangs."
He cut off coffee since it has zero nutritional value. When the inmates complained, he told them,"This isn't the Ritz/Carlton. If you don't like it, don't come back."
He bought Newt Gingrich' lecture series on videotape that he pipes into the jails.When asked by a reporter if he had any lecture series by a Democrat, he replied that a democratic lecture series might explain why a lot of the inmates were in his jails in the first place.
More on the Arizona Sheriff: With temperatures being even hotter than usual in Phoenix (116 degrees just set a new record), the Associated Press reports: About 2,000 inmates living in a barbed-wire-surrounded tent encampment at the Maricopa County Jailhave been given permission to strip down to their government-issued pink boxer shorts. On Wednesday, hundreds of men wearing boxers were either curled up on their bunk beds or chatted in the tents, which reached 138 degrees inside the week before. Many were also swathed in wet, pink towels as sweat collected on their chests and dripped down to their pink socks. "It feels like we are in a furnace," said James Zanzot, an inmate who has lived in the tents for 1 year. "It's inhumane."
Joe Arpaio, the tough-guy sheriff who created the tent city and long ago started making his prisoners wear pink, and eat bologna sandwiches, is not one bit sympathetic. He said Wednesday that he told all of the inmates: "It's 120 degrees in Iraq and our soldiers are living in tents too, and they have to wear full battle gear, but they didn't commit any crimes, so shut your damned mouths!"
Way to go, Sheriff! Maybe if all prisons were like this one there would be a lot less crime and/or repeat offenders. Criminals should be punished for their crimes - not live in luxury until it's time for their parole, only to go out and commit another crime so they can get back in to live on taxpayers money and enjoy things taxpayers can't afford to have for themselves.
Sheriff Joe was just reelected Sheriff in Maricopa County, Arizona.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Sonoma Republican Party Barbeque - Oct. 6
Sunday, September 23, 2007
Danoodle's NYC blogger begins UN gig
Saturday, September 22, 2007
San Diego County Pension Woes....County tells public employees.."You Pay for it !" while those that gave it away are facing felony charges !!
San Diego public employee abuse of taxpayers is no different than Marin County's except they are now bankrupt and many of the union bosses and conflicted policy makers are awaiting trial on FELONY charges while taxpayers are left with a mess. One solution: Unions should pay for this mess.
Retirees could cover pension-perk shortfall
Sanders blasts low fees for more years of credit
By Jennifer VigilSTAFF WRITER
September 22, 2007
SAN DIEGO – Mayor Jerry Sanders, angry over the San Diego pension system's formal admission yesterday that prior retirement boards undervalued a special employee perk, opened up the possibility that the burden of the $146 million shortfall could be placed on current and future retirees.
The sum represents about 15 percent of the city's $1 billion unfunded pension liability, a debt that has led to five years of financial and legal turmoil and protracted conflicts between elected officials and employees.
Advertisement The announcement marked a vindication of sorts for City Attorney Michael Aguirre, who has long made the case that the city was bearing an unfair share of the expense of a program that allowed employees to purchase credit for up to five years in which they did not work.
Aguirre also has said benefit increases granted in 1996 and 2002 are illegal, but courts have soundly rejected the contention. He is appealing the decision.
Sanders and Aguirre have stood by each other's side while criticizing the city's previous handling of the pension fund, but recent spats over development and water conservation have caused tension.
The mayor – who left City Hall early after an emotional week in which he reversed his stance and supported same-sex marriage – issued a late afternoon statement in which he called the low fees employees were charged for additional years of credit “completely unacceptable.”
Aguirre was unaware of the development, as the mayor's office prepared to ask him to evaluate the city's options. Although he has criticized the pension fund's board and administration at almost every turn, Aguirre said he would “work with whomever, whenever if it means less for taxpayers to have to pay.”
A pension specialist working for the retirement system found last month that the shortfall on the purchase-of-service program rose to $20 million by 2000, then jumped dramatically – by $126 million – in three years. That mirrors other estimates offered by consultants in 2004 and 2006.
Pensions are calculated using a formula that includes the number of years worked and the final salary earned by employees. Increasing one of the factors allows workers to receive higher payments once they retire.
From 1997 to November 2003, employees paid 15 percent to 26 percent of their annual salary to obtain each extra year of credit. The pension board raised prices in late 2003, to 27 percent to 50 percent of salary. The fund's liability has not risen due to the program since.
More than 3,200 current city employees have participated in the program. Aguirre said the city's options include trimming the share of the city's annual payment to the pension system that is applied to the credits.
That could shift the responsibility to retirees, who could be given the option of paying the difference in price or giving up the credits. Rebecca Wilson, a pension spokeswoman, said the system will host meetings within the next two months to give fund contributors a chance to weigh in on the next step.
An early version of the mayor's news release accused former board members – most of whom, until 2005, were city employees – of committing “conscious acts” in pricing the credits incorrectly. Sanders' staff later dropped the accusation.
Six former pension board members are facing felony charges stemming from their votes on retirement fund matters, but Steve Robinson, a prosecutor in the District Attorney's Office, said his case is strictly focused on actions allegedly taken in 2002 and probably won't be widened.
“It's very unlikely there would be an inquiry unless there was new information,” Robinson said.
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Senator Migden says - Go away so I can push my "values" .
Mark:
State Sen. Migden’s comments in the IJ just make my blood boil.First, she thinks it’s not only her right to pick her voters (which was accomplished under the corrupt redistricting plan that the Legislature refuses to reform, despite demands from even left-wing organs like the SF Comicle) but now she thinks she should be “unopposed”. Talk about freaking hubris….
Second, she’s convinced she’s done a “really good job” and says her job is to “spread our values”!!!! Since when is it the job of an elected official to “spread values”? Let alone the alternative lifestyle “values” she’s embracing?
Lastly, she wants top raise taxes and give more money to “education”, read: CTA (one of the most powerful special interests in the state), without mentioning that education gets about 60% of the entire budget now, or the god-awful results our public schools in Cal. have produced.
Jim
"You're Fired" from Marin Club
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
What Celebrities Teach Us About the Nanny State
Hark! “Celebrities” and the media that follow them might just serve a purpose after all. Britney, Lindsay and Paris, and their various rehab and legal troubles, actually offer us a glimpse into the world of court-ordered rehab and First Amendment violations.
This item about Spears’ custody battle is illuminating. US Weekly (that bastion of accurate and serious reporting) writes that a judge ruled today that Britney can keep partial custody of her children, if she complies with a list of court mandates including meeting with a parenting coach 8 hours a week to observe her parenting skills and twice-weekly random drugs and alcohol tests.
I know nothing about Britney Spears, and I have no opinion about her parenting skills. But I do find it interesting that the court system can mandate such obviously invasive procedures as a result of a custody case. Perhaps this would be acceptable after a full child-services investigation (though there are legitimate questions about that as well), but such measures as a result of a divorce case seem like an extreme example of the courts overreaching their jurisdiction.
Also according to US weekly, Britney and Kevin (how do I even know his name??) cannot make derogatory statements about each other. Is that not a violation of the First Amendment? Perhaps the court is employing the logic of driver’s licenses; having children is a privilege, not a right? Both options offer insight into the power of the courts.
This first occurred to me when I came across an article mentioning that Lindsay Lohan was wearing a court-ordered Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (or SCRAM). Reuters tells us that SCRAM is used in,
“Court-ordered rehabilitation programs of 43 states. About 40,000 people nationwide have used the device, some of them voluntarily…Worn around the lower leg or ankle, the monitor detects whether a person has been drinking by measuring the evaporation of alcohol from perspiration on the surface of the individual's skin, using essentially the same technology as a Breathalyzer.If it weren’t for Lohan, we never would have known this system existed. I didn’t even know there was such a thing as court-ordered rehab. It's mildly disconcerting that a judge can order someone to go to rehab and wear a bracelet monitoring their intake of a legal substance.
Data from the device is then transmitted electronically to the company's field operations personnel, who in turn furnish the information to a probation officer, counselor or other person assigned to oversee the patient's recovery.”
Lohan’s coke-pants incident also highlights some legal quirks: her previous rehab attempts help her case. They show that she is struggling with addiction, and historically judges are more lenient on addicts than on your normal weekend drug-user. Paris Hilton’s DUI case is another example. If you are to believe the reports, it can sometimes take only one drink to fail a Breathalyzer. This might be good information to know should you run into one of Beverly Hills’ festive Christmas roadblocks, designed to capture those driving “under the influence.” While we would never advocate drunk-driving, we are beginning to wonder what exactly constitutes “drunk” these days (and if the taxi lobby is somehow behind it…) We hear sugar and caffeine are addictive substances too - are they sufficiently "influential"?
If you argue loudly enough, you can find a public-safety justification for just about any law (no handheld cell phones in cars, anyone? Children under 12 must ride in the back seat? No smoking in PG-13 movies? We could go on…) And history shows that capricious states are willing to enforce laws that compromise individual freedom (the anti-contraceptive law which led to Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) and established the right-to-privacy doctrine.)
In tandem with this morning’s hearings about wire-tapping abroad, our privacy at home is worth scrutinizing too. It’s just funny that we have to hear about it through LaLohan.
Picture via Newday.com and MSNBC
Monday, September 17, 2007
Elephant Talk added to Danoodle.com
I've added a Campaign Directory to a new page at Danoodle - Election 08. Email me at howeybarb@danoodle.com if you have any additions to the Directory. I need to fill in the blanks.
Also, I've added a Fav Quotes page, where I'm parking the Julia Roberts "repugnant" quote...should never be forgotten or relegated to the wastebin.
Sunday, September 16, 2007
Who is in charge here? by Mark Hill, former Chairman and current member, Marin Republican Party
Who is in charge here? By Mark Hill, former Chairman and current member, Marin Republican Party. Blog posted Sunday, 9/16/07. This recent article about the Marin County public union pension fund advisor and her cronies giving her an unprecedented 40% increase (ummmm...remember, when SHE retires that will be for lifetime benefits too !) is just mind boggling. Even with the increased scrutiny from County taxpayers, the press and lawsuits going against this unmitigated rip off of taxpayers, the union bosses have no shame. Who is in charge of the oversight here one should (and have) ask? Well, its kind of hard to tell from the quotes embedded in this article:
MARIN IJ "McGlashan said making the pension system an independent district would be similar to the Transportation Authority of Marin, on which the county has representation, but its board and management decisions are independent from the county.For years, retirement system workers have been considered county employees, even though they are paid by the pension system."
Let me get this straight, actually, forget it....there is no straight about it...I am cross eyed by it. Can't those that supposedly represent us, present taxpayers with a straight answer, accountability and oversight??? If not, why not? Answer: THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE UNION BOSSES and the Marin County Supervisors who are beholden to them.
MARIN IJ "McGlashan on Tuesday said it's time to consider "disconnecting the type of awkward oversight" role in which supervisors find themselves. The pension system should be "a completely independent body," he said. "
We are family???? The County has over 100,000 residents. These 3000 current employees (40% retiring in less than five years) and 2000 plus retirees, have taken their "family members" (that would be us) for over $700 mm. And like any bully, his last line wins its all: "We're together (aka "you are going to have to pay all this money we forced or tricked your Supervisors into paying us..$700mm) whether you separate us out or not". GOD HELP US.
Hero of the Week - Michael O'Leary, Chief Exec, Ryanair
Saturday, September 15, 2007
Are these CA voters moving to Nevada?
Thursday, September 13, 2007
Eagle Forum's Constitution Day Breakfast, Santa Rosa
Marin Club brouhaha...continuing
Hi from Santa Barbara
Monday, September 10, 2007
Day 3. I love Tom McClintock
I love Tom because he always brings up some interesting tidbits in his speeches, ie, CA Repubs have lost 325,000 voters - always heard and repeated; never heard, the Dems have lost 450,000 voters!! (approx. numbers as best as I can remember with my caffeine-deprived brain). Are 750,000 people leaving the Golden State because it is no longer golden?? Schwarzenegger & Co. say Repubs are losing CA because the CRP isn't reinventing its' core beliefs, like he has done.
Sunday, September 9, 2007
"Conventions for Dummies" book needed
Day 3. MIA: Rudy, Mitt, Fred, Mike, et al
Saturday, September 8, 2007
Day 2 at the Games
OK, so we didn't make it to the Aerial Tram yesterday; ok, so we didn't make it to the Guv's dinner last night (and from what I've read & heard, glad we didn't!). We didn't make it past the Renaissance Atrium (as pictured). For Convention details, Jon Fleischman's Flash Report is terrific for you wonks out there.
I'm off to a media seminar put on by the CRP. I'm skipping McCain lunch today. I can't bear to hear the guy who took some of our free speech away with McCain-Feingold (much less pay $). My heart is not in it.
Friday, September 7, 2007
Rats, not Fats
(Or: Critters in the Kitchen, Elephant in the Room)
Hello from Danoodle’s New York Correspondent Gillian, here to report on all things political in America’s First Third-World City™.
Just in case you think that Bay Area politics don’t affect the rest of the country, ponder this: the strangely influential anti-trans fat lobby convinced Tiburon to become the first trans-fat-free city in the country. Last spring, our "Republican" Mayor Michael Bloomberg made New York the second. And the story is an excellent example of how arbitrary special-interest regulation can distract from the real issues of government.
The same week Bloomberg and the city council rendered our McDonald’s french fries inedible (have you tried french fries not marinated in artery-clogging trans fat?), footage aired on local news channels of another threat to health and hygiene: rats roaming free in broad daylight in a KFC/TacoBell right around the corner from my Greenwich Village apartment.
This prompted many New Yorkers to question the mayor’s health priorities. And thanks to this “shocking” footage, the city’s long-dormant health inspection department has finally come to life again, closing down restaurants left and right. Even now, many storefronts across the city exhibit the yellow notice of shame.
The rodent problem has always been an open secret in New York, where piles of garbage and mice are a regular feature of the morning walk to the subway. Even the best of restaurants (such as Danoodle’s beloved CafĂ© Del Mar) occasionally have local wildlife scurrying across the floor and scaring patrons. But while the sporadic mouse in a dining area is one thing, rats in the kitchen are quite another. The fashionable Da Silvano restaurant (also around the corner - they're closing in and I'm setting traps!) was recently caught with rats in the kitchen, and the problem runs the gamut from that sketchy all-night pizza place to the supposedly exclusive Waverly Inn (where I once witnessed a mouse crawl out of the ivy wall and onto my friend’s shoulder).
Here at Danoodle's NY HQ, we advocate the adoption of an LA-style restaurant grading system, where even the Four Seasons restaurant has to prominently display the Health Inspector's "A" (albeit in a lovely gilded frame). And we propose that before local governments regulate weakly-researched lifestyle issues like the danger of trans fat, they should address the very real, very obvious rat in the room.
Let the Games Begin
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Marin girl makes good
Congrats to Barbara Howey on DaNoodle
Marin Club brouhaha
My First Blog
I want to change the perception of Republicans - square, uptight, un-cool, but I can't change their honesty, forthrightness, steadfastness, generosity, patriotism, and their exceptional brainpower! Over the years, I've found Republicans to be extremely, to-the-max, informed on local and national issues, which is definitely more than I can say for some Democrats in Marin!
Upon moving to the Bay Area in 1975, Barbara worked for the Social Security Administration; PBS's national television show OVER EASY with Hugh Downs and Mary Martin; and for the Levi Strauss Tourage clothing line in San Francisco.
Barbara was a conservative Democrat until 1992. After seeing what was going on in Education after her daughter entered school, she came to her senses and re-registered as a Republican that year. Her husband, a life-long Republican, was very happy!
Barbara began her Bay Area political activities in 1996 when she founded a conservative speaker's group, United Conservatives of Marin. She left UCOM in 1998 to manage Republican Russ Weiner's campaign for California State Assembly, Sixth District.
In 1999 Barbara co-founded Howey-Moi Associates, a public relations firm that represented Bay Area Republicans and national conservative organizations.
She is currently an empty-nester. She is a member of the Nob Hill Republican Women Federated, Marin Republican Women Federated, Novato Republican Women Federated, and has volunteered for various Republican activities for the past 9 years.